You must log in or register to comment.
no shit. this post is dumb. when they say in the news that *ai" is great at science/medical thing, thry arent talking about llms. a lotof bteakthrough was done with google alphafold.
Not a surprise at all, as those old CNNs are tuned specifically for the task.
Considering CGPT et al were getting ~48 percent accuracy versus the old tuned net’s ~64 percent, we’re still dealing with coin toss odds here.
I thought that as well, but its not a yes/no question, its „which of these 6 diognoses“
Yeah and the neural network is still 16% better, which isn’t insignificant.
