UNPOPULAR OPINION: popular opinion
deleted by creator
Kinda but you would need to limit corporations abusing addiction for profit like they already do with things like nicotine
Portugal. They’ve essentially been doing this for years.
Drugs are decriminalised and in themselves legal.
It’s still technically a crime to use them but generally you are treated as a patient with addiction. Not a criminal.
There’s still a massive body of criminal law around supplying, and producing them.
So they are not dismantling controls on drugs but targeting the issues drugs cause instead of criminalising users needlessly.
Not perfect there but certainly lessons to be learnt.
People need education not prohibition…
All the “just say no” stuff didn’t count as education.
D.A.R.E. was objectively a massive failure.
Turns out when you tell kids that weed is just as bad as crack, they start wondering “what else did they lie about” when they figure out weed is fine.
It’s all based on lies though. You tell them weed is as bad as other drugs then they try weed and it’s fine you can imagine the conclusion drawn from that.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Sure. Would Walmart start selling fentanyl? Would people buy it?
deleted by creator
So you’re saying it’s a massive problem already… and it’s illegal? Damn, must not be working too great.
deleted by creator
Because the reason there are overdoses is because no one has any idea the strength of any of the drugs they take. Knowing exactly the dose of the drug you’re taking because it’s legally purchased is a gigantic benefit
deleted by creator
A gallon of bleach can kill people, and we sell that in Walmart. People don’t want to die, they want to get high. If you can buy 20, 100 microgram doses, why would you take all 20 at once unless you wanted to die, and if you wanted to die, well, there are more guns than people in the US, trains exist, razors exist… Are we to wrap the entire world in bubble wrap?
Disclaimer: if we have an aligned AGI I may well be for some version of wrapping the world in bubble wrap, but I’m almost certain alignment includes allowing people who truly want to die, to die, but having very few such people because of treatments for depression, a world that doesn’t suck, etc.
You can buy enough alcohol to kill you in Walmart too
You can buy enough alcohol to kill you in any supermarket here in the UK. Along with other chemicals that could easily kill a person if not used responsibly. Pretty sure you can in the US too. Along with guns if I’m not mistaken, which can also kill if not used responsibly.
If Fentanyl was sold at retail it would probably be in pre-measured doses, like pills.
Your reference to a “massive junkie” concerns me. People often think that the second someone uses drugs they become an addict with no self control. Just as the majority of people who use alcohol do so responsibly the majority of people who consume illegal narcotics, including opiates, also do so responsibly. But because of drug laws they have to hide it or they could lose their job, be ostracised by society or arrested. So the only illegal drug users who openly speak about it are the addicts who have lost control and want to quit or mentally ill people, so they’re the only drug users people see.
Known dosage and purity. People die of overdoses, and of adulterated doses. A vast amount of the horror of krokodil is the production method leading to impurities, and much of the demand for it comes from the lack of other drugs and the ability to cook it up in a garage.
People seem to be accessing it just fine. I’m not saying my opinion would improve the situation, but it would definitely change something.
deleted by creator
Yes.
Yes and yes
I think 30 years ago or so before a bunch of countries proved this worked for many drugs, this would have been an unpopular opinion.
Now, I’m not so sure.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
There are several entire countries that give the death penalty for just possessing small amounts of certain drugs.
The whole drug system should exist in its own perpetual economy.
Sell drugs legally, all profits go towards treatment and prevention.
Make all illegal drugs legal and nationalize all pharmaceuticals, then keep making money on all of it but use the profit to change all drug use into an actual benefit to humanity rather than another way to monetize abusing people and profiteering from their misery.
The way civilisation views both legal and illegal drugs is to think of it as a business and money maker, rather than a product to help people.
Drugs have existed for hundreds of thousands, potentially millions, of years before humans. Peyote, poppies, cannabis, mushrooms, coco, and many hundreds of other plants just happen to have chemicals that make monkeys feel good.
Meh, having everything instantly legal would be too much especially without the funding for care centers where addicts can get help. As well as preventative systems for addicts.
Decriminalization is a step better but it doesn’t solve the problems of dealers lacing fentanyl into things people dont expect.
That said, it’s absurd to not already have things like psychedelics/weed/kratom decriminalization and small amounts of party drugs. The fact that the punishment for doing drugs far more harmful than the dugs themselves is mind boggling.
Not really unpopular. Most Scientists and even some politicians agree that the war on drugs only made things worse and that prohibition is not working.
Actual unpopular opinion: people obsess over legalization models for everything because they have bad enforcement models to base their data off of
Law enforcement in the US distributes drugs. Corruption has turned “informants” into a system where the police are essentially gangs which monopolize both criminal activity and the law. Our air force got caught cooking MDMA on a nuclear base in the Netherlands. We have a base here in Texas that changed names because they keep having suicides mass shootings and sweeping SA allegations under the rug. Two of the soldiers got caught with a middle schooler man. There’s so many goddamn drugs
Anyways my point is sociologists studying the US actions will assume it is impossible to make anything illegal without causing havoc.
There are ways to eliminate issues like prostitution and drug abuse without locking up prositutes or giving people possession charges or locking up street dealers making less than minimum wage. That kind of criminalization does absolutely nothing other than ruin lives
Which ways, can you detail them?
You go after the pimps and distributors, to begin with. Help get low level members of these orgs out and back into society. Genuine rehabilitation is not the goal of our prison system, just slavery. To state the obvious you prolly know.
I am not a huge fan of the Nordic model but it is miles better than trying to get the UN orgs to call pimps “sex workers” ugh
Ah yes, the Nordic model… Like Sweden and it’s obsession with drugs, to the point where the doctors will rather you suffer than get you help because if they give you something that can be perceived as addictive, you’ll just become a degenerate addict.
How about the zero tolerance part on having or being on drugs, the one where they will literally ruin your life and any future prospects if they find you with a banned substance in your blood…
You know where that’s led to? It’s led to Sweden having the highest drug related death rate in Europe.
I don’t get why governments get to tell people what they can and cannot take tbh. I love smoking weed, if I have the right strain it decreases my anxiety by 80%,but some fucker in government only understands “drug bad”, so fuck me and my anxiety.
Weed should just be legal tbqh but still controlled like booze but some drugs should always be strictly be medical imho there should not be recreational sedative markets really.
Alcohol is bad enough and weed at least doesn’t cause respiratory depression but idk about recreational benzos or whatever. Opiates. That’s medical shit.
Prohibition does nothing but punish the poor and poorer countries.
I’m curious what you’d think would be better than the Nordic model; to my current understanding it’s the path the evidence best supports as leading to rehabilitation.
That said, if we just imported the Nordic model and made no other societal changes, I don’t think anything would meaningfully change. Pimps and dealers exist because there is an economic place for them. Even if you arrest people and then treat them with kindness, understanding, and education, it doesn’t remove the incentives that pushed them into that role in the first place, and it won’t stop someone else from moving into the vacuum that arrest creates.
I want Mao Zedong thought
But what about all the shareholders who have a stake in the prison-industrial complex?
They can go to rehab for money addiction.
I think we should legalize and hand off distribution and production to major colleges. Have a lot of the profits go toward lowering tuition that way we can elevate our citizens to a higher standard where we can eventually lessen the use of drugs for escapism.
Do you really want what has happened with unrestricted tobacco to happen with meth?
Legalized ≠ unregulated
Like by prescription only like opiods or like no advertising like tobacco?
Regulations come in many forms.
It all depends on the type of drug and what is dangerous about it.
Checking in for the struggling sober. Controlled access and decriminalisation need to go hand in hand with
he ded rip
Yeah kinda my point we cant just consider the criminal impact like OP is doing with blinders on
I think most people would agree on the surface but the devil’s in the details: that statement could mean anything from making schedule 1 drugs available at detox centers to removing prescription requirements on antibiotics to grabbing a bag of ricin at the corner store on your way to work
To clarify strictly, I mean recreational drugs. Drugs that have been used for recreational and medicinal purposes that have been legally restricted in some way.
Very libertarian point of view and one that I’ve held for years. Not unpopular.
deleted by creator
We don’t need AI, we’ve had those chemicals for decades. They’re called Research Chemicals and some countries (like the UK I think) preemptively ban them, while in others they have to be explicitly banned. It’s an ongoing cat and mouse game, but if you asked me I’d rather take a well known compound and not some random crap that was invented last year and like 6 people took.
The awesome drugs with lower side effects are the well known ones, like LSD.
deleted by creator
I did a research chemical that was supposed to be like LSD, called 2C-P.
May or may not be legal depending on where you live, but I’d be weary of doing it again. I overheated like a motherfucker. And although it was potent, it didn’t feel like a clean high you get with LSD.
I agree with the other poster. I’d much rather do drugs that have a long, proven history as opposed to something that is relatively unproven.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
