The House has voted 211 to 204 to refer the articles of impeachment filed against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to committee, effectively killing the impeachment effort spearheaded by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky.

Tuesday’s vote short-circuits any potential floor vote on the articles of impeachment, and virtually guarantees the measure will not be taken up before the current session of Congress expires.

The vote provided a surprise reprieve for President Trump’s embattled Defense Secretary, who was facing an impeachment vote by the full House as early as Wednesday.

Massie reintroduced the articles of impeachment on Monday, accusing Hegseth of high crimes and misdemeanors in connection to the war with Iran and U.S. strikes against Iran and on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sure. Conviction ain’t gonna happen, though. Enough conservative Dems will vote against it and give the “now is not the time, we need to move forward and heal” bullshit

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I fucking hate that bullshit, one of the most important things about moving forward and healing is dealing with what has happened.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Punishment can be counterproductive… in an environment of reconciliation where there is a consensus that the wrongdoing happened and was wrong and shouldn’t be repeated.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Oh definately, there are plenty of times when it far more productive to help rather than punish.

          One of rhe best examples was after WWII, the US and the allies vould have crushed Germany, but they recognized that they would rather have Germany as a strong ally in Europe and helped west Germany move forward after the war.

          Was this decision perfect? No, there were plenty of war criminals that escaped punishement.

          Was this decision good? Yes, I believe so, Germany was rehabilitated and is now a close ally to the US and Europe.

          The stituation here is different, Hegseth and the other MAGA guys will not conceede reason and won’t cooperate honestly, in these cases some people needs to be made an example of, and Hegseth is an excellent candidate.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Indeed.

            (I don’t know if it was obvious but I do fully realise that we are not in the situation I described with Hegseth and MAGA!)

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nope, this is one of the principles of truth and reconciliation. It’s predicated on the idea that all parties want to move on from the wrongdoing, rather than one or more wishing to continue it.

            • flandish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              not punishing those doing war crimes is not “moving on.” it’s allowing it to continue.

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I see you’re doing your best not to understand and congratulate yourself on your success.

                • flandish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  what do we gain by their promising during an election cycle that which they never intend to do? how does not punishing literal criminals help?

                  • FishFace@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    The prerequisites for truth and reconciliation are not met in the US at the moment, as I made clear, so that’s not what I am talking about.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Enough conservative Dems will vote against it

      No they won’t. I’m a bit frustrated so few people understand such basic political theater

      Any impeachment votes are a purity test. Zero chance Hegseth is convicted. Everyone in congress knows that

      Impeachment forced Republicans to go on record defending Hegseth, which can be used as fodder for attack ads in 2 years

      The reason it is only ever political theater is because a conviction requires a 2/3rds super majority in the senate. Even with the blue tsunami Democrats aren’t even close to that with 56 votes