fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Linguistics@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agoEsperanto: The artificial language that aimed to unite humanitybigthink.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down12
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkEsperanto: The artificial language that aimed to unite humanitybigthink.comfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Linguistics@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·10 months ago Currently Esperanto is in a weird “double dilemma”: it’s weakly designed, but languages with a better design barely have speakers; it’s spoken by a relatively low amount of people, but the other options are all languages associated with national identities. Reminds me of the programmer’s expression: “there are two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about, and the ones nobody uses”
minus-squareLvxferre@mander.xyzMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoYup. It’s a bit like this, but on two levels - people complaining about natlangs because “nobody”* uses Esperanto, and complaining about Esperanto because “nobody”* uses the other auxiliary conlangs. *I mean, proportionally.
Reminds me of the programmer’s expression: “there are two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about, and the ones nobody uses”
Yup. It’s a bit like this, but on two levels - people complaining about natlangs because “nobody”* uses Esperanto, and complaining about Esperanto because “nobody”* uses the other auxiliary conlangs.
*I mean, proportionally.