Once again our current govt shows it’s disdain for Maōri and te Tiriti.

  • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    What they said was they were glad the people involved on the kapa haka group were more inclusive than you.

    You then flew off the handle at the minor slight. They then joined you afterwards.

    You were doing great with the argument that the curriculum shouldn’t be shaped by outliers. Simple, factual and not attacking the person - just debating the point constructively.

    This appears to be a reading and comprehension issue (possibly complex dyslexia if there’s an autism diagnosis that early on in the kids life?), you perhaps could have stuck with that? I dunno, you do your thing. I’m just pointing out how needlessly rude you were.

    • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      What they said was they were glad the people involved on the kapa haka group were more inclusive than you.

      No they made a specific insult and said I was against inclusion of children with disabilities in kapa haka groups.

      I’m just pointing out how needlessly rude you were.

      I feel no need to be polite to people who hurl unwarranted insults at me and accuse me of being a bigot.

        • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I called her sick because she wants to deny students books with maori words in them because her child has a learning disability.

          I never said kids with disabilities of any kind should be excluded from any kapa haka group or anything else, she made that accusation out of the blue.

          • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            And look in your defence, they DID have a clumsily worded anecdote that was only tangentially related (and it took AGES to reveal the additional challenge these books created for their kid, was what they were getting at - I understand that).

            I guess what I’m getting at is: attack their point - not the personality.

            Needless to say, I’m over it…