• Speiser0@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    1 year ago

    The first panel is popular media, not computer scientists.

    The computer scientist would write papers about how they adapted principles of the alien technology to our stuff.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      1 year ago

      Papers that would be released 5 years after the engineer got doom to run on it.

      • ali@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        1 year ago

        If accepted.
        Reviewer’s comments:

        • While the paper is well-written overall, contributions on adaptation of alien technology as well as comparison with state-of-the-art are not made clear.
        • Authors should consider using TikZ to create the diagrams. My Kindle e-reader had difficulty scaling and displaying the diagrams.
        • The paper’s tone could benefit from more technicality.
        • The terms “alien”, “ET”, “technology”, and “stuff” have been used ambiguously throughout the paper. The authors should consider including a table of nomenclature.
        • The experimental results don’t appear to provide sufficient statistical significance on how much the mankind’s genitalia could be pleased using the alien apparatus. The results would be more conclusive if the application of the apparatus on extraterrestrial genitalia is studied too. This has the additional benefit of avoiding to fall for spurious relationships.
        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          1 year ago

          And now I’m having publication flashbacks.

          They made me go back and demonstrate that stream discharge increases during a flood, and I’m the end we spent so much time and effort working on it, the whole thing changed into a comparative analysis between rainfall and peak discharge.

          They critiqued us so hard we changed topics.