• Dagrothus@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    They piggybacked off the success of dos2 which was a better game anyways. Sure, theyll lose the dnd fans that play solely for the familiar IP, but theyve gained enough name recognition to be massively successful on their own. Just keep making good games like From Soft & that’s all they need.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly I disagree that dos2 was better I think bg3 was much more intricate with skills abilities and playstyles than dos2 was

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agree. DOS’ elemental surface effects was cool, but having to deal with it all the time got old. Even more so with necrofire. I’m really hoping DOS3 learn something from BG3’s more conservative usage of surface effects.