• reinei@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Whaat‽ You mean auto downloading and executing foreign JavaScript in a users webpage from some server/CDN I might not even know myself as an ad company could be an attack vector? Never!

      (This mostly for those people who may not know that some [most? Dunno don’t have a source for this] ad networks literally allow advertisers to inject small chunks of html into pages for “more interactive/better ads”!!)

      • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        executing foreign JavaScript

        This is a great point I try to convey to my less-technical friends and family. Looking at a webpage is not like changing the channel on a tv of old. Looking at a webpage pulls code from who knows where and executes it on your local machine.

        These advertisers expect that I should blindly trust them to execute code on my cpu, in my memory, on my machine? Yeah fuck that, it’s a privilege. I don’t invite every hobo walking by to come into my house and take a shit in my toilet.

        If they don’t like that not everyone executes their syphilis-ridden javascript, then they should put their shit behind a paywall. But they won’t, since they know they don’t have a product worth paying for.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      What a great argument! You didn’t even read the first sentence…

      It isn’t an ethical concern and hasn’t been since the 90s.

      You’ll have to explain to me how not compensating someone for their work has been ethical since the 90s.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’ll have to explain to me how not compensating someone for their work has been ethical since the 90s.

        Opening my computer up to Malware is not worth the fraction of a penny that the person who did the work will receive from my click.

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          To the person receiving the money, it is worth it. Else they wouldn’t be doing it.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I’m glad to hear they are willing to sacrifice the safety of my system for their fraction of a penny.

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Cool story bro but you clearly still didn’t even read the first sentence of what I wrote.

            • Atemu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes and that’s precisely the point. You can make the decision not to pay and there are good reasons to do so (I do so too) but you must recognise that someone is still not getting paid for their work.