Twitter, now X, was once a useful site for breaking news. The Baltimore bridge collapse shows those days are long gone.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Great for seeing a headline and then finding an article yourself. Less great for finding articles. Half of you people here have a penchant for linking super weird news sources.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even Lemmy does that, though. You’re still influenced by the headline, the community/moderation and the users.

      Assuming that everyone clicks through to the article, and doesn’t comment before reading the headline, anyhow.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        And at the news organization, you are influenced by the editors and framing by authors.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy is massively biased though. While that doesn’t mean the articles aren’t factual, you’re still only ever hearing one side of the story. What I find time after time is that majority of people who have strong opinions about current events are completely uncapable of fairly steelmanning the opposing side’s argument.

      • RedFox@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agreed.

        Lemmy, you are biased. You probably don’t intend to be, but it’s true for now.

        Going to sound weird, but I came here because of who I knew the vocal people were. I didn’t understand many of their view points and reasons for being mad/hateful/etc. I am much more enlightened now and learn different perspectives everyday.

        It is a giant echo chamber though if you are already very rooted in the spectrum here, and voicing decent usually leads to dog pile.

        This is related to attitudes about news, politics, etc.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not sure why you think that news orgs aren’t also biased. Everything and everyone is biased, even those that genuinely try to not let it show through and be fully impartial.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          So what are you implying? That it doesn’t matter where you get your news because all sources are biased anyway?

            • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              There’s still a massive difference between news sources like NY times and Breitbart. It matters where you get your news from and even if it’s coming from a biased source you should atleast be aware of the bias. Some sites atleast try to counter their bias while others embrace it. These things matter. It’s not binary.

              • hamid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                Difference in quality? Yes. Difference in bias? No. The NYT has an extreme neo liberal US oriented business empire bias that as a refugee of the Iran Iraq war and victim of US foreign policy they supported that I don’t trust. I also don’t trust Breitbart.