• incogtino@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    F-Droid used to build and sign the APK for each app they distribute using keys owned by F-Droid

    That meant you had to trust F-Droid to distribute the app as per the source, and hope that the source hadn’t been compromised (as the developer wasn’t signing anything)

    Now when a new app is added to the repo, they build an APK from source and compare it with an APK distributed by the developer

    If they match exactly (and if there is no reason to think the developer key has been compromised) then F-Droid will instead distribute APKs signed with the developer key, and verify that the same key was used for each update

    If the same key was used, F-Droid doesn’t need to build the APK themselves but can distribute the update as-is

    The advantages then are that F-Droid is acting as an additional layer of security and assurance to the developer signing the APK, and updates can be distributed faster as F-Droid doesn’t have to build them

      • incogtino@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that video is primarily complaining about F-Droid self-signing, and that it creates: a requirement to trust them; a single point of failure for security; and slows updates

        The trade off is that developers must maintain their key, if they lose it the user must uninstall and reinstall the app, as Android will not trust an update signed with a different key

        • Nakres@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What alternative does the video promote? Trusting Google and the Playstore? Trusting each dev of every app to deliver apks which match the code? I don’t want to give the video more clicks if it’s scaring away people from F-droid towards worse alternatives.

          • incogtino@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No need to click, it complains about exactly what has now been changed. In essence you are always trusting the dev, why add other parties to that chain