The European Commission argues it was Europe’s students and young graduates who were most affected by Brexit’s mobility restrictions. The UK has reportedly responded cooly to the proposal.

The European Union is trying to improve mobility between its 27 member-states and the UK, particularly for people between the ages of 18 and 30. But whether such a proposal would be welcomed by London remains to be seen.

The EU’s executive arm, the European Commission, is trying to open bloc-wide talks with the UK on allowing youth from EU countries to study or work and live in Britain for up to four years, with the same arrangement for British youth.

The proposal would largely revert youth mobility to pre-Brexit times, when members of the then-28-member EU, including Britain, were allowed to work and study without visa requirements. The Commission’s new plan would involve a visa, but one whose fees would not be “excessive.”

  • Shard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    8 months ago

    Everyday we are reminded of the damage that state-sponsored misinformation can do.

    The stupidest part about brexit was that it was a non-binding referendum. They could have just ignored it. But I guess sometimes you need your house to burn down before you realize why we need a publicly funded fire department.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s was only non-binding if they lost, like they had previously. Asshats like Farrage were just going to keep trying until they got the answer they wanted.

    • InformalTrifle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Having a referendum then ignoring the result because it’s not what you wanted or expected might not have gone down so well. Especially when that referendum was the carrot used to get people to vote for Cameron

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But I guess sometimes you need your house to burn down before you realize why we need a publicly funded fire department.

      Question… were you bringing up the house out in Tennessee that burned down because the county didn’t have a publicly funded fire department? Because if so, that’s a hell of a deep cut.