• David_Eight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Did they? If the game is owned and published by Sony what part did Arrowhead play. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I genuinely don’t know. Like doesn’t the publisher(Sony) handle all of this?

          • David_Eight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah I read about that later but, I’m still not clear on a few things. Did Arrowhead literally ignore that part? I assumed that there was a technical issue preventing Arrowhead from adding the PSN requirement from being added that has recently been fixed?

            Second, releasing the game in countries that don’t have access to PSN, was that done maliciously by Arrowhead as well? I also assumed the publisher would of handled the Steam listing, if not was Arrowhead attempting some sort of protest of their own trying to force Sony hand. Or is Arrowhead just incompetent lol?

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Some of the community managers have drank the coolaid, but other than that the devs seem to support the protest

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        What dev would be stupid enough to make their game more complex with multiple logins…

        I’m willing to bet that steam probably has amazing api and docs for account integration and that it’s better than PSN.