• MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If i get this right, that attack only works before the tunnel is initiated (i.e. traffic encrypted), if the hosts is compromised, right? No danger from untrusted points inbetween, right?

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      This technique can also be used against an already established VPN connection once the VPN user’s host needs to renew a lease from our DHCP server. We can artificially create that scenario by setting a short lease time in the DHCP lease, so the user updates their routing table more frequently. In addition, the VPN control channel is still intact because it already uses the physical interface for its communication. In our testing, the VPN always continued to report as connected, and the kill switch was never engaged to drop our VPN connection.

      Sounds to me like it totally works even after the tunnel has started.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, it’s like a fake traffic cop basically, sending your (network) traffic down the wrong route

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          More like a corrupt traffic cop. There are reasons you might want this kind of functionality, which is why it exists. Normally you can trust the cop (DHCP server) but in this case the cop has decided to send everyone from all streets down to the docks.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            These types of attacks would likely be implemented via DHCP spoofing / poisoning, unless you’re on a malicious network

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No, it works at any point and the local network needs to be compromised (untrusted), the host can be secure.

      So it is likely not an issue at your home unless you have weak Wi-Fi password. But on any public/untrusted Wi-Fi, it is an issue.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That being said, it apparently does not affect Mullvad apps on any platform other than iOS (Apple does not allow fixing it on iOS). I suspect other serious VPNs are also not vulnerable outside iOS, since it is prevented by simple leak prevention mechanism.