Im pretty good at wanting stuff; i think i can manage two at a time; both the progeneitors and the fanatically complicit who so often refuse to imagine better and attack me for trying.
Typical Internet pedant, who’s also missing the larger point, which is that you said you want people to be vivisected for buying a car. The subtext is that you’re cool with torturing people who make choices you don’t like, so I figured you’d be cool with flaying people.
Also vivisection can involve some flaying.
Either way, the point is that some people are put into situations where they need to buy a car to survive, and you want to harm them, viscerally, over that. That’s a pretty fucked up position to have, and you can’t nitpick your way out of it.
Pretty sure thats not subtext. Whats the opposit of subtext. Domtext? It’s dom text. But poojt taken, will reduce dubtlety; maybe time instead of posting on the internet ill emboss it on a brick of something that normally just says ‘drop and run’ and beat a few drivers in the skull with it.
also vivisection can
Sure, but it can also not, and lots of other things. Plus it’s educational. Plus flaying has some gendered classed and specifically transphobic baggage i don’t want to fuck with. Not interested in splash damage here.
either way
Okay. They’re also put into situations where they need to do other atrocities or eat people or kill strangers to survive. That’s pretyy fucked up too
car users deserve an excuse
Okay, youre right. Like how it’s not murder if you use a car. And how those fuckers aleays defend against any alternative existing.
I’m against punching down. It’s not ‘RaNdOM’, it’s just going deeper than aesthetics. Which i suppose could look in congruous from a certain perspective.
Weird that you’re against punching down but also desperately want to torture people with vivisection when they are forced to buy a commodity in order to survive. Seems hypocritical.
Well, they’re drivers not people.if they think nothing of ebdanfering my life for convenience, why the fuck should i care about theor well being? If you’re putting my life at serious risk for reasons that i had no part in, there’s nothing morally wrong with anything i do to you.
Like, if your bookie says you’ve got 24 hours to pay up, and you try to mug me, it’s not bad for me to do basically ajyyhing to you-especially if i asked if you wanted to get together and get rid of your bookie together and you told me to ‘fuck off you delusional idealist; this is the only way’.
Im pretty good at wanting stuff; i think i can manage two at a time; both the progeneitors and the fanatically complicit who so often refuse to imagine better and attack me for trying.
But also, who said anything about flaying?
Flaying, vivisected, whatever. You want to torture people to death for buying a car.
Vivisected implies they remain alive, asshole!
And also different from flaying!
I remember when language sometimes had nuance and wasnt entirely just vibes. I miss that.
Typical Internet pedant, who’s also missing the larger point, which is that you said you want people to be vivisected for buying a car. The subtext is that you’re cool with torturing people who make choices you don’t like, so I figured you’d be cool with flaying people.
Also vivisection can involve some flaying.
Either way, the point is that some people are put into situations where they need to buy a car to survive, and you want to harm them, viscerally, over that. That’s a pretty fucked up position to have, and you can’t nitpick your way out of it.
No im a special kind. Youll see!
Pretty sure thats not subtext. Whats the opposit of subtext. Domtext? It’s dom text. But poojt taken, will reduce dubtlety; maybe time instead of posting on the internet ill emboss it on a brick of something that normally just says ‘drop and run’ and beat a few drivers in the skull with it.
Sure, but it can also not, and lots of other things. Plus it’s educational. Plus flaying has some gendered classed and specifically transphobic baggage i don’t want to fuck with. Not interested in splash damage here.
Okay. They’re also put into situations where they need to do other atrocities or eat people or kill strangers to survive. That’s pretyy fucked up too
Okay, youre right. Like how it’s not murder if you use a car. And how those fuckers aleays defend against any alternative existing.
Man if you think flaying has some political baggage you really haven’t looked into vivisection’s history.
So you’re pro murder but also against murder, weird. Have fun playing at being RaNdOm I guess
I’m against punching down. It’s not ‘RaNdOM’, it’s just going deeper than aesthetics. Which i suppose could look in congruous from a certain perspective.
Weird that you’re against punching down but also desperately want to torture people with vivisection when they are forced to buy a commodity in order to survive. Seems hypocritical.
Well, they’re drivers not people.if they think nothing of ebdanfering my life for convenience, why the fuck should i care about theor well being? If you’re putting my life at serious risk for reasons that i had no part in, there’s nothing morally wrong with anything i do to you.
Like, if your bookie says you’ve got 24 hours to pay up, and you try to mug me, it’s not bad for me to do basically ajyyhing to you-especially if i asked if you wanted to get together and get rid of your bookie together and you told me to ‘fuck off you delusional idealist; this is the only way’.