• smonkeysnilas@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    That argument is stupid. My robot lawn mower “can drive itself” but it can’t follow traffic rules and would crash after a while if set to drive on its own in a road. Just as a Tesla. What Musk was implying was “it can drive itself without violating traffic rules and causing crashes” and clearly it can’t.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think FSD is further along than you think it is.

      certainly a lot further than the kind of “self driving” present in your standard robotic lawn mower

      • smonkeysnilas@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Well yes, but the end result after driving unattended in traffic for a while is the same still, that’s the point. You could argue that a FSD Tesla makes it a bit further, I guess that’s true but still it’s far from what Elon was selling to the people.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think FSD is further along than you think it is.

        This is the issue with all these debates currently. The people arguing against FSD are totally unaware of how far it has come since just a few months ago. They have already made up their minds based on how much it sucked a year ago and they’re under the illusion that it’s at best just marginally better today. I love watching the YouTube channel CYBRLFT and seeing people’s minds getting blown in real time when they realize that what they’ve heard on the news and on social media is so far from the reality.

        Is it perfect? No. Is it unbelieveably good? Yes.