PugJesus@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoAh, the true path to socialism!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1730arrow-down154
arrow-up1676arrow-down1imageAh, the true path to socialism!lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squareBrotherL0v3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down7·7 months agoIf factories in your country have suicide nets, maybe you aren’t doing socialism right.
minus-squareDahGangalang@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down2·7 months agoIf factories in your country have suicide nets, maybe you aren’t doing domestic governance right. FTFY
minus-squareLeate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·7 months agoI think both premises are well-justified by the presented evidence. That is to say, doing either effectively makes suicide nets vanishingly unlikely.
minus-squarexor@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoOne could even go as far as to argue that doing either effectively implies also doing the other effectively at the same time
minus-squareDaft_ish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down5·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareBrotherL0v3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·7 months agoFor what it’s worth, I picked up on the sarcasm. 🤣
If factories in your country have suicide nets, maybe you aren’t doing socialism right.
If factories in your country have suicide nets, maybe you aren’t doing domestic governance right.
FTFY
I think both premises are well-justified by the presented evidence. That is to say, doing either effectively makes suicide nets vanishingly unlikely.
One could even go as far as to argue that doing either effectively implies also doing the other effectively at the same time
deleted by creator
For what it’s worth, I picked up on the sarcasm. 🤣