• Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    AMD’s your friend now, but they’re only undercutting NVIDIA like this to get on top of the market. Once they’ve done that, it will be NVIDIA doing the undercutting, and AMD will be the one clamping down and exploiting their position.

    It has happened time and time again.

    Don’t simp for corporations. They’ll never return the favour.

    • solarvector@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally agree, but when one of the two participants in a market is actively hostile to users and the other is actually competing for market share, seems like that’s worth acknowledging. Especially when we so many examples of either outright collusion or as soon as one corporation introduces a new hostile feature all the others in the market follow.

      On that note, I’m waiting for the day Nvidia announces a subscription service for unlocking cores or clock speeds.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The triple whammy of semiconductor shortage, pandemic and cryptocunts has really fucked PC gaming for a generation. The price is way out of line with the capabilities compared to a PS5.

      I’m still on a 1060 for my PC, and it’s only my GSync monitor that saves it. Variable frame rates really is great for all PC games tbh. You don’t have to frig about with settings as much because Opening Bare Area runs at 60fps, but the later Hall of a Million Alpha Effects runs at 30. You just let it rip between 40 and 80, no tearing, and fairly even frame pacing. The old “is this game looking as good as it can on my hardware while still playing smoothly?” question goes away, because you just get extra frames instead, and just knock the whole thing down one notch when it gets too bad. I’m spending more time playing and less time tweaking and that can only be a good thing.

      • Raz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m just clutching my pre-covid, pre-shortage GTX 1080ti. Hoping it’ll keep powering through a little longer. Honestly, it’s an amazing card. If it ever dies on me or becomes too obsolete, I’ll frame it and hang it on my wall.

        I just wish AMD cards were better at ray tracing and “work” than Nvidia cards. Otherwise I’d have already splurged on an AMD if I could.

  • SaltyLemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD has been great and all buy their prices are NOT affordable. They’ve been jaking up their prices like everyone else in the last years. Don’t paint them as the heroes.

  • ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no doubt that AMD is a better company than NVIDIA in OSS terms.

    But don’t simp for a company, vote with your wallet and always look for the best and consumer friendly product.

    For now, not gonna lie AMD is pretty rad, but I hope next generation Intel GPUs are competitive.

  • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    GPU prices being affordable is definitely not a priority of AMD’s. They price everything to be barely competitive with the Nvidia equivalent. 10-15% cheaper for comparable raster performance but far worse RT performance and no DLSS.

    Which is odd because back when AMD was in a similar performance deficit on the CPU front (Zen 1, Zen+, and Zen 2), AMD had absolutely no qualms or (public) reservations about pricing their CPUs where they needed to be. They were the value kings on that front, which is exactly what they needed to be at the time. They need that with GPUs and just refuse to go there. They follow Nvidia’s pricing lead.

      • justsomeguy345@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        something many people overlook is how intertwined nvidia, intel and amd are. not only does the personnel routinely switch between those companies but they also have the same top share holders. there’s no natural competition between them. it’s like a choreograhped light saber fight where all of them are swinging but none seem to have any intention to hit flesh. a show to make sure nobody says the m word.

      • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, it’s just strange from a business perspective too. Obviously the people in charge of AMD feel that this is the correct course of action, but they’ve been losing ground for years and years in the GPU space. At least as an outside observer this approach is not serving them well for GPU. Pricing more aggressively today will hurt their margins temporarily but with such a mindshare dominated market they need to start to grow their marketshare early. They need people to use their shit and realize it’s fine. They did it with CPUs…

    • eldenlord@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not to mention except north america, in almost all countries amd gpu is always $100 more expensive than nvidia counterpart making it just non sense to buy any amd card unless you are just a fanboy

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where I can find the source?

    As far as I searched what is free software is the Vulkan implementation that runs on top of the intrinsic GPU and drivers (that have DRM and no source code).

    The intrinsic GPU drivers on the kernel are still close source. So basically AMD and NVIDIA are the same. They both have source for some engines implementation but both kernel drivers are close source.

    https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/

    amdgpu is a blob.

    I’m missing something?

  • beq@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have read many of the comments in the thread, but there is a very basic question I hope someone can help me with: what does the OP even mean?

    I know what AMD is and what they do, but “taking W’s”? And “giving them away”?

    • jsdz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “W” is a letter often used to represent a “Win” which I assume is what’s meant here since that’s what AMD have been doing.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is what you have to do if you’re behind the competition. Don’t think they’ll keep this up for long if they happen to be the industry leader.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll never go for Nvidia ever again.

    I’ve been a Linux only user for over twenty years now and Nvidia is the fucking devil. Their drivers range in quality anywhere from “ugh” to “wtf!” and my current Nvidia card (it’s a loan) gives me continuous screen artifacts and kwin (screen manager) crashes. AMD drivers just work.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an AMD fanboy, I approve of this.

    And now, for a serious note: been running linux daily for almost 20 years and AMD machines are, per my personal experience, always smoother to install, run and maintain.

    • I’ve been intel w/ nvidia since 2007 on Linux. Recent trends have me thinking AMD is the way to go for my next one though. I think I’ve got so used to the rough edges of Nvidia that they stopped bothering me.

      As someone who has been ignoring AMD for most of this time, (my last AMD product was something in the Athlon XP line), can I do Intel CPU w/ AMD discrete GPU?

      • joenforcer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this is what my wife was doing. I’m also doing the reverse: AMD CPU, NVidia GPU. I considered AMD but went NVidia mostly for the PPW on an undervolted 4070. It results in a cool, quiet, low-wattage machine that can handle anything that matters to me, which AMD GPUs still can’t match this gen even with the upcoming 7800XT they’re trying to compare against the 4070. I’d wait for some PPW analysis before making a choice depending on your needs. There’s way more to the analysis than GPU source code or even raw performance that is often overlooked.

        Oh,and don’t sleep on AMD. Though I don’t feel like the AM5 platform is fully baked, Ryzen architecture is rock-solid and I fully recommend using it if your history with Athlon is what’s keeping you away. I actively avoided them for the same reason until a friend convinced me otherwise, and I’m so glad I did.

          • joenforcer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can’t speak to that, unfortunately. But I assume there would be no issues. The devices themselves are system agnostic; Windows isn’t doing anything special to make them play nice with each other.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can I get back to you, say, in three weeks?

        I’m about to put together a machine based on a AB350 chipset, with a Ryzen 5 (g series, for graphics from the start) and after that I intend to install on it a budget RX580.

        If the thing doesn’t ignite or explode, I’ll gladly share the end result.

  • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish AMD offered solid hardware ray tracing… Nvidia has a near-total monopoly on GPU rendering workstations, because there’s simply no competition.

  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD’s had some buggy drivers and misleading graphs, but they’re overall infinitely more consumer-friendly than Nvidia