• emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’re comparing smaller elections for seats with a big election like the U.S. president.

    You are right. There is a difference between parliamentary and presidential systems. Parliamentary systems reward parties that are locally strong. Presidential systems require a party to have a national base. So then, the problem is not with FPTP per se, but with Presidential forms of government.

    You can’t just wish away the spoiler effect.

    I have already shown multiple examples of third parties under FPTP systems. I don’t know what other evidence you expect.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      So then, the problem is not with FPTP per se, but with Presidential forms of government.

      It’s a combination problem. There is only one seat available, and the race is done with FPTP, meaning the spoiler effect is especially strong.

      If we switched to approval or star, no such effect would take place. Of course there is other election reform needed to make third parties viable, but there is no such thing as a simple solution for this problem.

      I have already shown multiple examples of third parties under FPTP systems.

      And those parties wield very little power. There are still parties that dominate the elections. No one party should have anything even remotely close to 50% of the seats.