• bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    so tell me if ive got this right:

    you don’t believe the democrats will listen or can be pushed left. you don’t believe they have any intention of changing course and that they have accepted that they’ll lose votes because of it. you don’t believe they can be trusted to make the right choices, choices you would support.

    you aren’t able to take direct action that would reflect your political beliefs and your clear eyed possession of a basic moral compass (i’m right there with you, my 60 hour workweek, family obligations and employer preclude me from much more than being present at events and holding signs).

    but you won’t reflect any of that with the action you are able to take in november, denying the democrats your vote that they have already counted out. you aren’t willing to make your voice heard in the only way that they will listen to.

    you posted some memes and its important to recognize that this isn’t some hypothetical or thought experiment. a sitting american president is literally aiding a genocide and denying its existence at the same time. you have the opportunity to not support that action.

    you can register your dissatisfaction with that in a way that cannot be deepfaked, covered up, misinterpreted or sidelined by casting a ballot for a party whose platform is “palestinian statehood and stop weapons shipments to israel”.

    it won’t require that you put yourself in danger or that you expose yourself to attack and it doesn’t take any more time than what you were already planning to do.

    on the topic of how a vote can be interpreted, let me give you a concrete example that will hopefully help illustrate what i’m saying: biden received 81,283,501 votes in 2020. was the biden campaign team able to examine, for example, vote number 12,345,678 and determine if that person genuinely believed in biden’s platform or if they were simply disgusted with trumps covid response?

    of course they were not. votes are interpreted by campaigns as support. they are not able to interpret them as anything but that. that’s not because the voters genuinely support those candidates, but because the vote only contains information about support.

    that’s why campaigns use a bunch of other methods to figure out what people were actually trying to express with their votes, like polls, statistical analysis and interviews, to varying degrees of accuracy.