Lead Lemmy Developer, Dessalines, denying the Tiananmen Square Massacre and praising the Uyghur Genocide

https://sh.itjust.works/post/8419342

Dessalines AKA “parentis_shotgun” on Reddit, is the main Lemmy dev, also the admin of lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml.

Their post and discussions on Reddit (archive as the original post must have been removed):

https://web.archive.org/web/20230626055233/https://old.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/cqgztr/fuck_the_white_supremacist_reddit_admins_want_me/

Please join the discussions for Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem:

https://lemmy.world/post/16211417

And the discussions for finding/creating alternative communities on other instances:

https://lemmy.world/post/16235541

What is a tankie?

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes or their allies. More specifically, the term has been applied to those who express support for one-party Marxist–Leninist socialist republics, whether contemporary or historical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    When the users can create their own instances or even fork the entire project for free, the dynamic is different. Plus, calling discussion “value” is kinda goofy.

    Lemmy.world has censorship too, just see return2ozma’s recent ban for criticizing Biden and not posting pro-Biden content as well, literally admitted by the admin in an official post.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is such a typical liberal answer. The value isn’t just created by the users’ post but by the collective network effect of all the users being in one place. That is not replicated when a new instance is created. Tankies know this which is why they’re acting like old Reddit mods with retaliatory style moderation.

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          I have read Marx, unlike you who’s just learned about Lenin through memes.

          The network effect is a commodity. That’s why X and Facebook fight for users and put them in walled gardens.

          Their valuations are based engagement. The most powerful and successful capitalist enterprises in history are all social media companies but okay discussion isn’t a commodity. How myopic can you be.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The network effect is not a commodity. Lemmy is not produced for profit, it has no Value. Reread Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1. It has a Use-Value, but no Exchange-Value and is not produced for profit. Capitalism necessitates profit and an M-C-M’ circuit by which Capitalists accumulate, which is absent from Lemmy entirely.

            You’re deeply unserious.

            • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              7 months ago

              Another pedantic tankie argument. Just because something is not being exchanged doesn’t mean it can’t.

              Regardless originally I said the network effect had value, not that it was a commodity. And the VALUE cannot be replicated by building another instance. Therefore the users do not own THE VALUE that they produce.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                Lemmy is a decommodified Reddit. There’s no profit motive. The network does not have Value, as it is not being exchanged. It has a Use-Value, in that it is useful, but nothing is being taken from workers as nothing is exchanged.

                Please read Capital, Chapter 1 of Volume 1 makes this extremely cut and dry.

                • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Let me ask you something. Is there anything preventing Lemmy devs from selling the code and going private like a gazillion FOSS projects have?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    They could, but the code could also be forked and remain free. Does the fact that Capitalism could exist in the future mean it presently does?

                • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So you think Communism = Non Profit. Please read Capital Vol 1-3 by Karl Marx and not screeds by Lenin.