• Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I gotcha:

      • Btrfs
        • BTree File System
          • A Copy on White file system that supports snapshots, supported mostly by
      • ZFS
        • Zetabyte File System
          • Copy on Write File System. Less flexible than BTRFS but generally more robust and stable. Better compression in my experience than BTRFS. Out of Kernel Linux support and native FreeBSD.
      • HFS+
        • what Mac uses, I have no clue about this. some Copy on Write stuff.
      • NTFS
        • Windows File System
        • From what I know, no compression or COW
        • In my experience less stable than ext4/ZFS but maybe it’s better nowadays.
      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Great summary, but I’ve to add that NTFS is WAY more stable than ext4 when it comes to hardware glitches and/or power failures. ZFS is obviously superior to both but overkill for most people, BTRFS should be a nice middle ground and now even NAS manufacturers like Synology are migrating ext4 into BTRFS.

        • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well that’s good to know because I had some terrible luck with it about a decade ago. Although I don’t think I would go back to windows, I just don’t need it for work anymore and it’s become far too complex.

          I’ve also had pretty bad luck with BTRFS though, although it seems to have improved a lot in the past 3 years that I’ve been using it.

          ZFS would be good but having to rebuild the kernel module is a pain in the ass because when it fails to build you’re unbootable (on root). I also don’t like how clones are dependant on parents, requires a lot of forethought when you’re trying to create a reproducible build on eg Gentoo.