• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sure buddy, you referenced the shit that’s “in plain sight” that only you can see with your special eyes and not the book where that exact story is written. Go ahead and ignore the other half of my comment though.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      So can you prove to me that Napoleon Boneparte existed without using historical writings?

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s how history works. To prove any event, you generally need to reference a book.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I didn’t reference a book.

            That’s how history works. To prove any event, you generally need to reference a book.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              What are you expecting me to do? Prove the existence of God using only a lemmy comment and not referencing anything else?

              Atheists and their stupid goalposts, I swear.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Moving goalposts? Like you’ve done every time I’ve asked you to tell me what it was that I’m ignoring that’s in plain sight? I’ve repeated that question at least 5 times now and you’ve yet to answer it.

                Christians and their hypocrisy, I swear. Either prove your religion is correct or stop pushing it on people and judging them for not following it’s arbitrary rules.