“no practical reason”, except for the fact that no one would understand you if you decided to replace the entirety of your sentences with oogas and boogas. It’s as if language serves a purpose, curious how that works.
IQ tests aren’t even a valid metric of reasoning, they’ve been debunked… Yet another reason not to take this post seriously. I’ll provide sources since it seems like you can’t be bothered, with a god complex like yours, no wonder you think your word is law…
Not to even mention… You think correcting spelling/grammar mistakes is racist. Do you even know the history of IQ tests you’re vehemently defending like a clown?
“no practical reason”, except for the fact that no one would understand you if you decided to replace the entirety of your sentences with oogas and boogas. It’s as if language serves a purpose, curious how that works.
IQ tests aren’t even a valid metric of reasoning, they’ve been debunked… Yet another reason not to take this post seriously. I’ll provide sources since it seems like you can’t be bothered, with a god complex like yours, no wonder you think your word is law…
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480769/
https://www.rider.edu/blog/are-iq-tests-flawed-rider-professor-explores-dark-history-iq-tests-ted-platform
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121219133334.htm
Not to even mention… You think correcting spelling/grammar mistakes is racist. Do you even know the history of IQ tests you’re vehemently defending like a clown?
https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/racist-beginnings-standardized-testing
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8376687/
https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28152/chapter/212962746