• multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    So nothing happened.

    Yeah, no shit. What did you expect? The US to go “oh sorry, we’ll stop existing now”? The US empire won’t crumble after one embarrassing video. You can’t make the claim Assange/Wikileaks is a US asset just because their leaks didn’t lead to the collapse of the US or significant change.

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I never made the claim that Assange is a US asset but I did say in the original article, and still say, that nothing happened after the Collateral Murder video, so what is even your argument? Did something happen after Collateral Murder, or not?

      In the broader picture that the US military may have leaked Collateral Murder themselves, it would have played right in their hands to release it. That’s the argument.

    • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can’t make the claim Assange/Wikileaks is a US asset just because their leaks didn’t lead to the collapse of the US or significant change.

      Did ye just handwave a bunch of evidence right here in the article?

      Again, notably absent were US soldiers, intelligence analysts, senatorial aides or anything of the sort. But somehow, Wikileaks easily found Chinese dissidents to help them (despite Chinese dissidents saying for years that speaking up against the Chinese government is very dangerous to their lives!)

      John Young, the founder of cryptome.org and a member of Wikileaks from the start, left the group in early 2007, calling it a “CIA conduit.” He has since rescinded that statement, but leaked more than 150 pages of emails sent between Wikileaks founders when he left.

      It is however concerning that in 2011, Assange told Reuters that “China is [Wikileaks’] real enemy” and that Wikileaks was looking at ways to circumvent their “censorship”,

      • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is however concerning that in 2011, Assange told Reuters that “China is [Wikileaks’] real enemy” and that Wikileaks was looking at ways to circumvent their “censorship”,

        That could be his “free speech absolutist” stance or perhaps his Australian/Anglo bias seeping in. I don’t think it proves or indicates that he was a CIA asset. Hardcore Maoists also hate the current Chinese government/system, are they CIA assets too?

        • deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          But consider the other evidence I just told ye;

          if he wasn’t indirectly an asset,

          why tf did he join it when the website seemed to pried open to CIA influence as ‘CIA conduit’ and the acceptance of Chinese dissidents as such, according to co-founder John Young?

          • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What do you mean join it? Didn’t he start Wikileaks? As I said, the whole supporting Chinese dissidents thing is his free speech absolutist stance: if he supports US dissidents leaking stuff about the US govt. he also supports Chinese dissidents doing the same. That’s what the idea behind Wikileaks was, a global dissident platform.