Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      given the run rates all these fuckers have, I half expect they feel glad it’s “as low as it is”. couple of the authors I’ve seen speak about it reckon pay out better to them (once off) than they tend to get from book royalties (I saw chisnall and some others post around it earlier). precedent from this is probably a good thing, even if I wish it went harder (esp given how likely “a fine you can afford is just a tax” is to develop as a normal situation)

      re burn rates: openai confirmed in the last day or so that it expects a $118b burn through 2028. fucking obscene

      • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        According to the article, it could be higher than 1.5 billion, though by how much they don’t really say. But they’re estimating about $3000 per book. For a class action that actually seems extremely high.

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          But compared to the anti piracy fines for sharing music from decades ago it is pretty low.

          Saw people suggest it was because the judge doesnt want to kill the goose that is laying pyrite eggs.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          yep, I was seeing some folks reckon it might be 20~30x what they’d make in later royalties. I’m not knocking the suit or the value to authors - mostly just wishing it were more so it might cause an even sharper effect