Wind turbines get a bad rap for killing birds—but they actually kill far more bats. Scientists estimate that millions of bats die every year after slamming into the giant blades, making turbines one of the top killers of the animals worldwide. But just what exactly lures bats to turbines in the first place is a mystery.

New laboratory experiments suggest the key is light. Bats use the brightness of the open sky to navigate—a visual cue replicated by light reflecting off turbine blades. Much like a moth drawn to the flame, these reflections create an “ecological trap,” drawing bats into fatal collisions, researchers report this month in Biology Letters.

“It’s one of those studies that doesn’t get done very often,” says Jack Hooker, a bat biologist at the Bat Conservation Trust who was not involved with the work. Unlike many large-scale studies on bat deaths around turbines, he says the new work focuses on a specific possible cause and tests it with rigorous experiments. Understanding why bats gravitate toward these machines could help researchers find better ways to protect them, he says.

Bats seem to be unusually attracted to turbines. They loiter in the air next to the giant energy-generating machines and spend an inordinate amount of time near their masts and blades.

The attraction is unclear, but what is known is that bats have evolved to use the open sky as a visual guide while navigating. Brighter patches in their blurry field of vision indicate the direction of the sky, and they orient toward them. As a result, Kristin Jonasson—an independent physiological ecologist—hypothesized that at dusk and dawn, turbine blades might reflect just enough moonlight to make them look like the bright sky, luring bats toward them.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems simple.

    Have the blades emit a high frequency sound the bats can hear.

    Ideally a sound they don’t like, but any sound is enough for them to learn that the sound is dangerous and associate with turbines.

    Eventually they’ll adapt

    • Redfox8@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I believe there are such devices, but I don’t know how effective they are or how often they’re placed on turbines. I presume that as this study has been carried out, then they’re not effective enough.

      Re "eventually they’ll adapt " this is a terrible approach to conservation! How many individuals need to die before you decide something isnt working? Also, if that were to work then all animals would have adapted to our existence already and there’d have never been any extinctions! I get your thinking but you’ve missed some cruicial understandings about animals. A lot of the time they simply can’t adapt, not quickly enough at least.

      • relianceschool@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A lot of the time they simply can’t adapt, not quickly enough at least.

        Yes, that’s the key point. Individual species take a long time to adapt through evolution, and ecosystems can adapt at the cost of losing some species, but nothing can adapt at the speed and scale with which humanity is reshaping the Earth. A huge portion of the planet is no longer suitable for anything other than generalists, scavengers, and invasives.