• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s a fascist dogwhistle, especially the way its use is normalized on MoG.

    I recall back over a decade ago when trolling fascist dickheads at /pol/, I called on my inner cantankerous, old man to ridicule their illiberal views and started calling them backward degenerates trying to set society back to the dark ages. With their scant vocabulary, they went agog with astonishment at this new word and went

    Degenerate? What’s that mean?

    Then they became absorbed with that word & brought it back from old man parlance into their common sayings with degenerate this & degenerate that. They couldn’t get enough of it.

    Believe me or not, point is it wasn’t always a dog whistle, it has been used to criticize the pieces of shit using it as a dog whistle for being that very thing they purport to oppose, and it still can be used that way. Nothing stops anyone else from claiming it back.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      While those specific people might legit not have known the word, it has been in common parlance in right-wing and fascist circles for decades.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      point is it wasn’t always a dog whistle

      It was used to describe indigenous people of Africa and America to promote eugenics (at least to the 19th century).

      It was popularized by the Nazis as a specifically far right term, to describe anything that didnt meet Nazi ideals.

      When its used to discuss culture (art, religion, etc) or traits of a person (sexuality, race, gender expression, etc), its a really blatant dog whistle.

      Like everything, context matters, but it absolutely has been one for a very long time.