• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah interesting. I didn’t know. I started using Firefox as a kid around version 2.

    I totally want Firefox to make money, but I wonder if donations couldn’t be a significant part of that pie today. It seems a lot more people would prefer to donate to Firefox than Mozilla.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I feel like Mozilla could have been what NextCloud is today. Totally free, open source, and offering a vast offering of office apps, with paid hosted versions. It could be all neatly integrated into Firefox, and you would pay a premium to use them without self hosting. The only thing they did was create Firefox VPN, and the only reason most people use VPNs is because of scammy marketing.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Totally free, open source, and offering a vast offering of office apps, with paid hosted versions.

          When Mozilla was founded the idea of hosted webapps didn’t exist. Quite the frankly web standards didn’t yet exist to allow such a thing to exist. Those were the days when you’d use Flash, Shockwave or Silverlight just to view media content on the web.

          But I do agree, they could be investing right now into feature rich hosted services, but they’ve only half-assed any paid services they’ve tried to integrate and then dropped them because they couldn’t get enough users to make it worth continuing the effort (mostly due to the half-assed effort they put in to start with)

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Exactly because Mozilla was around to see the Internet grow and mature they should have been fit to create such a suite.