• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A simple line of code that goes “if moisture < 0.25 then loaddone” of “water = weight * 0.43” isn’t AI, true.
    But when you start stacking enough of them with the goal and results being “We could get a chef to check how the pizza is doing every few seconds and, and control all of the different temperatures of this oven until it’s perfectly done, but we have made a computer algorithm that manages to do that instead”, then it’s quite hard to argue it isn’t software that is “performing a task typically associated with human intelligence, such as … perception, and decision-making.”

    Especially if that algorithm was (I have no idea if it was in this case btw) not done by just stacking those if clauses and testing stuff manually until it works, but by using machine learning to analyze a mountain of baking data to create a neural network that does it itself. Because at that point, it definitely is artificial intelligence - it’s not an artificial general intelligence, which many people think is the only type of “true AI”, but it is an AI.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      by using machine learning to analyze a mountain of baking data to create a neural network that does it itself.

      except that neither the article nor the vendor website even come close to claiming it uses a neural network. the article even says

      It’s a little less exciting than the name suggests.

      all the Pizza Intelligence does is use sensors to make sure the pizza doesn’t burn. it is literally as “dumb” as the humidity sensor in a dryer.