• Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kamala would be over 65 by term 2’s end. I think 70 is a good number but honestly I overwhelmingly agree with the sentiment. Make the max age lower and the right candidates will “magically” appear. The pecking order today sadly includes people in their 60s and 70s because we almost never elect different people for house/senate.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      we almost never elect different people for house/senate.

      Which is because of how we pick committee positions. People with longer tenures get better spots.

      • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I figured it was more about how people essentially ignore senate and house positions unless someone is retiring. They just vote the same way again and again.

        All people talk about by and large is the presidential election. I know very few people who know anything about federal senate and house reps, let alone anything at all about state senate and house reps. They think presidents decide everything when what’s really broken is congress. If congress wasn’t f’d they could fix the supreme court. If they fixed the supreme court then dictatorial law (and draconian interpretations of law) would change.

        In terms of committees, I figured the people who got the coveted ways and means spots were the ones with the most power and influence (money), not just old timers. Jason Smith is the chair of the house ways and means committee and he’s only 44. Senate side is over 70, though senators on average are much older than those in the house of reps.