• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes, that makes sense & made sense to me, but the ‘todays’ part confuses me. Isn’t it just the same exact thing in a bit later stages as far as the consequences go?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, generally. It’s trying to force the viewer to acknowledge present conditions, as a presumptive call to action to reorganize society along collective lines.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Aye, that is good.
        But perhaps it’s better to do that without implying that if it “worked” before it might again.

        It’s good for people to understand how other people have to live, but also that this is the result of such a system working as designed.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          But perhaps it’s better to do that without implying that if it “worked” before it might again.

          I don’t believe that is the point, here. It’s directly saying that this is the result of Capitalism.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Todays capitalism. As if West India & similar corps from ye olden days didn’t want this.

            But I understand, Im not sure why it bothers me as much.