• BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh you mean they’re going to underclock the expensive new shit I bought and have it underperform to fix their fuck up?

    What an unacceptable solution.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They aren’t over clocking / under clocking anything with the fix. The chip was just straight up requesting more voltage than it actually needed, this didn’t give any benefit and was probably an issue even without the damage it causes, due to extra heat generated.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Giving a CPU more voltage is just what overclocking is. Considering that most of these modern CPUs from both AMD and Intel have already been designed to start clocking until it reaches a high enough temp to start thermally throttling, it’s likely that there was a misstep in setting this threshold and the CPU doesn’t know when to quit until it kills itself. In the process it is undoubtedly gaining more performance than it otherwise would, but probably not by much, considering a lot of the high end CPUs already have really high thresholds, some even at 90 or 100 C.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you actually knew anything you’d know that overclockers tend to manually reduce the voltage as they increase the clock speeds to improve stability, this only works up to a point, but clearly shows voltage does not directly influence clock speed.