For my money, the worst thing about Blade Runner is how it created a franchise based on its own adaptation. The net negative outcome is we’re now categorically unlikely to ever see a cinematic portrayal of Rachael Rosen throwing a goat off a roof.
The best stuff in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is not in Blade Runner. The animal worship is tricky. It’s a source of dark humor that takes time to blend in with the rest of the world; while it lampoons the insanity of industrialized passions, it runs the risk of making the world goofy, and thus also the characters. I understand why Scott and company evaded it. It’s the chess that I love and miss.
There are multiple scenes in which opposing characters attempt to outmaneuver each other so subtly that the reader isn’t immediately aware it’s happening. The experience I loved so much was going back to reread the last few pages armed with the knowledge that these characters are actively trying to kill each other without letting on. I can’t think of anything else that gives me those particular tingles, and it’s a shame that the theme was unintentionally scraped out of the visual media franchise. I would love to see a different take on the source, but I also love the secret knowledge of this ultimate game of cat and mouse. Regardless, Electric Sheep remains an excellent example of a book with so much going on that thirty million dollars couldn’t capture it all.
On a barely related note, I’d love to see a feature film adaptation of Eye in the Sky.
Meanwhile Linklater’s “A Scanner Darkly” was actually quite faithful to the source material, discounting the merging of the Charles Frick character. Now THAT was a fun film!
Oh, and wasn’t 2012’s “Total Recall” pointless? Why??