35 crypto companies made a Change Dot Org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”
F that
Sign this one instead: “Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji”: https://www.change.org/bitcoin-is-stupid
35 crypto companies made a Change Dot Org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”
F that
Sign this one instead: “Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji”: https://www.change.org/bitcoin-is-stupid
Who gives an actual fuck?
a change.org petition, for or against bitcoin, is the perfect manifestation of bitcoin: entirely pointless
Well.
Step one. Bitcoin gets emoji.
Step two. Young people and other folks with fragile minds think it’s legit because it has an emoji.
Step three. Poor people lose their money.
Outcome: The rich get rich, the poor stay poor.
Alternatively: Step one. Bitcoin gets emoji.
Step two. Young people and other folks with fragile minds think it’s legit because it has an emoji.
Step three. Crypto currencies keep burning through resources as if it was a Brazilian rainforest.
Outcome: The few lucky ones will feel really stupid living in their bunkers after the collapse.
🤯: me when ☦️, ☪️, ☯️, ☸️, ✝️, 🕉️, ✡️ all have emojis making each one legitimate.
They’re stupid internet pictures people aren’t going to make financial decisions off of them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion
They’re all legitimate, doesn’t make them factual.
There is also an emoji for thieves. A cute one, even. Will young people start living that thug life because of the emoji?
How do you think the whole “be gay, do crimes” started? /s
What exactly is your definition of legitimate?
Removed by mod
Edit: Way to miss the point, downvoters. My point about emojis being “non-political” doesn’t mean to say “no politics.” I means “include whatever the fuck people talk about these days, be it in favor or against.” Just like the dictionary. Should dictionaries exclude the word “bitcoin,” then? Or am I being downvoted by Christians?
I don’t think emojis should be the place to have a socio-political discussion. Emojis should reflect how people popularly communicate.
Having said that, in regards of impressionable folks:
If Christianity gets to have a cross emoji (which is a torture device, let’s remember), then so should Bitcoin. And I don’t even like either!
have some entirely non-political emojis:
🗳️: BALLOT BOX WITH BALLOT
🇹🇼: FLAG: TAIWAN
🇵🇸: FLAG: PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES
🗽: STATUE OF LIBERTY
🤡: FACE OF “NON-POLITICAL” PERSON
Good for you. I never said I’m “non-political.” That’s a red herring, but just to be clear: did you miss the part where I said that emojis should represent what people think or talk about? All those examples you put are exactly what I meant. And did you miss the part in which I mentioned Christianity? Because if you think that Christianity is a non-political thing today, then I got news for you.
BACK to the fucking discussion: You’re proving my point that the emoji bitcoin should then be included. Because a large group of people talk about it, in pro- or against.
this isn’t debate club, come back later
addendum to what my co-admin said: don’t come back later, these posts are so fucking terrible I don’t want them in my database
When does it just become free advertising though? Should McDonald’s get an arches emoji?
deleted by creator
If scientology had an emoji then the comparison would be apt.
Why?
Is there a case of the unicode comission blocking proposals of a scientology emoji?
There is a wine emoji… There is a cigarette emoji…
People with fragile mind could think that it’s perfectly healthy to consume that stuff…
There is even a bomb emoji… People with fragile mind could…
Edit: Thanks for the dislikes. Negativity is way better than sharing arguments!!!111
yeah you’re annoying as fuck and we don’t need your posts
There’s people out there that don’t think emojis are as stupid as Bitcoin. Or maybe it’s the other way around. Either way, there’s some people out there and they’re wrong.
🤔