• tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was banned from Reddit for saying I enjoyed the parts of red dead redemption 2 where you had to kill slave owners and kkk members. Literally said I enjoyed a mainstream video game and the main quest. Inciting violence against polygons in an imaginary world that took place 150 years ago.

    Imagine saying you enjoyed playing Wolfenstein.

    14 year account. RIP.

    • abelcrunk@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think reddit ostensibly banned /r/ChapoTrapHouse because the mods weren’t banning people who said slave owners should be killed.

    • 🦥󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’m not sure what’s up over there where it suddenly became not ok to punch Nazis.

      It used to be even mainstream media encouraged punching Nazis. Don’t watch an old Blues Brothers movie if punching Nazis offends you too I guess.

    • blue_zephyr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit also banned me for saying nazis deserve to be punched. A comment I made under a post similar to this. Appearantly making such posts is fine, but commenting the same shit is unforgivable.

    • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wolfenstein: new order is pretty sus.

      In the game there’s actually a Jewish Cabal conspiring against the third riche, which would make the Nazis…right?

      Great game tho 7.8/10

    • LockheedMartinPorn@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I got booted for saying we should kill them, in relation to a repeat offender pdf file.

      Literally the next comment in the thread was saying it should be legal.

    • G_Wash1776@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s infuckingsane to me that not even 100 years since the end of WW2 and there’s still nazis. Fuck Nazis.

  • chaogomu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was once banned from Reddit for correctly pointing out that the medically approved cure for Nazism is one fist, applied directly to the face repeatedly until the afflicted individual stops being a Nazi.

    The medical professional applying this cure can substitute any handy blunt object for their first if so desired.

  • Poob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I got banned from a regular sub on Reddit for saying it’s ok to punch Nazis. How refreshing.

    • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably because it’s not okay to assault people who you disagree with or find unforgivable. Down votes and punching is easy, little kid stuff. Seeing where they are coming from, what they’ve been through, and understanding why they are this way, and helping them see their way out of it. That is the difficult part.

      • Poob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “People I don’t agree with” and “Nazis” aren’t the same people. I sympathize with people who have lives that lead them down the path to that, but once they’ve committed themselves to Nazism and start saluting in the street, then there’s no more sympathy.

        To be clear, you can come back from a lot of shitty beliefs. I have. But I also didn’t march in white pride parades with swastikas. I’m not talking about run of the mill conservatives.

  • BornVolcano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Image Transcription: Text and Image:


    THIS IS *NOT* OKAY.

    This sets a dangerous example, and we need to talk about it.

    If you punch a Nazi like this, you’re going to break your wrist. Remember, make contact with the largest two knuckles (index and middle finger) and keep a strong wrist. You want to hurt the Nazi, not yourself!

    Stay safe out there and keep punching Nazis.

    This has been a public service announcement.

    [Two images shown side by side. The first shows a young man in a black shirt standing on a crowded sidewalk, his hand raised above his head in the historical “Nazi salute” with a lightly smug expression. There is a person’s hand holding up their middle finger prominently in his direction visible from the right side of the screen, but everything past their forearm is out of the image frame. In the second image, the same man in the black shirt is shown with his hand at his side, as a second man in an orange shirt is shown in the middle of punching the taller black-shirted man in the jaw. The fist of the man punching is angled slightly upwards at the wrist, so his fist makes contact at the knuckles on his fingers rather than using the flat surface of a typical punch. The image is captured before the man in the black shirt reacts to the punch. The hand holding up a middle finger is still visible in the right of the frame.]


    ^I’m a human volunteer transcribing posts in a format compatible with screen readers, for blind and visually impaired users!^

  • Bombaaa@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cringe take to glorify any violence for having an opinion even if its offensive just as yours could be equally offensive to them. If you say your feelings aren’t hurt then you actually think violence is a good cause lol

    • littlecolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Violence is good, especially when punching nazis. The ideology is inherently violent. Punching a nazi is always self-defense.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cool but slippery slope Edit: I feel like a lot of people dont get it. For an example if you ban nazis and they get power they can ban the left side or trans people(etc you get the point). Also just banning stuff can screw up things. Same with allowing hitting someone for their (flawed) ideology. You have to assume that your enemies and also yourself dont have morals. Nazis think they are the good side(idk actually, im not a nazi). Violence and banning things should only be used as an extreme measure.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      slippery slope

      Nope. A Nazi is well defined.

      Conceptual slippery slope arguments assume that because we cannot draw a distinction between adjacent stages, we cannot draw a distinction between any stages at all.

      Example: "There is no essential difference between 199 and 200 grains of sand or 200 and 201 grains and so on. Thus, there is no difference between 1 grain of sand and 3 billion grains of sand.”

      Slippery Slope Fallacy

      • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he means that it’s a dangerous precident. Opening the door to political violence not only makes your side look barbarous, but is also a potential justification for future political violence against an arbitrary group.

        I hate Nazis, but we shouldn’t be punching people for saying stupid, hateful shit.

        We should be mocking them mercilessly.

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If your neighbours started saying your family needs to be put into gas chambers you’d laugh it off? Nazis believe in genocide. It is not a laughing matter. It is a threat.

          • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Believing in racial superiority is as absurd as a flat earth, but in-order to be willing to punch someone, you have to take their ideas seriously enough to find them threatening, there-by legitimizing them [for the audience the Nazi is targeting].

            Some rando standing on a street espousing the deranged ramblings of a long-dead dictator is not a legitimate threat in my eyes.

            If the rando is somehow having their verbal excrement backed by the state, then we can talk about violence, but that is not currently the case where I live, and in most of the world.

            I don’t want to debate a Nazi about whether the emperor’s clothes are ugly or not. I’m going to tell everyone the emperor has no clothes.

            • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some rando standing on a street espousing the deranged ramblings of a long-dead dictator is not a legitimate threat in my eyes.

              That’s exactly the first scene of the Twilight Zone episode He’s Alive. Not that it proves anything as it’s just a fictional story but it’s the first thing I thought of.

              An article that also comes to mind is Bartender explains why he swiftly kicks out Nazis even if they’re ‘not bothering anyone’. Basically, if you allow the “rando” Nazi’s a safe place to congregate they’ll tell all their friends who tell their friends and eventually your bar, town square, etc are the local Nazi hangout and the extremists start showing up. Now you have too many Nazis to safely and easily remove.

              Now, you absolutely don’t need to use violence as your language of choice, what’s most important is that you make it loud and clear that trying to put down roots is going to be more trouble than it’s worth.