• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    slippery slope

    Nope. A Nazi is well defined.

    Conceptual slippery slope arguments assume that because we cannot draw a distinction between adjacent stages, we cannot draw a distinction between any stages at all.

    Example: "There is no essential difference between 199 and 200 grains of sand or 200 and 201 grains and so on. Thus, there is no difference between 1 grain of sand and 3 billion grains of sand.”

    Slippery Slope Fallacy

    • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he means that it’s a dangerous precident. Opening the door to political violence not only makes your side look barbarous, but is also a potential justification for future political violence against an arbitrary group.

      I hate Nazis, but we shouldn’t be punching people for saying stupid, hateful shit.

      We should be mocking them mercilessly.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your neighbours started saying your family needs to be put into gas chambers you’d laugh it off? Nazis believe in genocide. It is not a laughing matter. It is a threat.

        • MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Believing in racial superiority is as absurd as a flat earth, but in-order to be willing to punch someone, you have to take their ideas seriously enough to find them threatening, there-by legitimizing them [for the audience the Nazi is targeting].

          Some rando standing on a street espousing the deranged ramblings of a long-dead dictator is not a legitimate threat in my eyes.

          If the rando is somehow having their verbal excrement backed by the state, then we can talk about violence, but that is not currently the case where I live, and in most of the world.

          I don’t want to debate a Nazi about whether the emperor’s clothes are ugly or not. I’m going to tell everyone the emperor has no clothes.

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some rando standing on a street espousing the deranged ramblings of a long-dead dictator is not a legitimate threat in my eyes.

            That’s exactly the first scene of the Twilight Zone episode He’s Alive. Not that it proves anything as it’s just a fictional story but it’s the first thing I thought of.

            An article that also comes to mind is Bartender explains why he swiftly kicks out Nazis even if they’re ‘not bothering anyone’. Basically, if you allow the “rando” Nazi’s a safe place to congregate they’ll tell all their friends who tell their friends and eventually your bar, town square, etc are the local Nazi hangout and the extremists start showing up. Now you have too many Nazis to safely and easily remove.

            Now, you absolutely don’t need to use violence as your language of choice, what’s most important is that you make it loud and clear that trying to put down roots is going to be more trouble than it’s worth.