• Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    1600 people? That’ll support a couple of dollar generals, it won’t support a big supermarket.

    It isn’t a food desert, it’s just rural. Money well fucking spent.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        So how much food do you want to waste so you can see a nice shiny super market in the middle of nowhere?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Enough so that people don’t starve? What a strange question. I’d rather waste food than have children go hungry.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Cool, there’s two dollar generals there already that sell groceries.

            What a supermarket would do is be a vanity project.

            • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Cool, dollar general only sells dry goods and not enough of a variety to cover basic food groups. There are no vegetables, proteins, or dairy products unless you include hot pockets.

              Rural American should be able to access more than frozen meals and junk food so stop being a prick. None should suffer from malnutrition and elevated crime rate.