“The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms
regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school
district”
That’s all the law specified. It didn’t state any the about “boys rooms” or “girls rooms”. If a school determined that a “boys room” will not be regularly used by menstruating students, they didn’t seem to need to stock them.
The law was neutral and didn’t seem to even be thinking of trans one way or another.
I was under the impression that the statement was accurate, what is incorrect? Just the word “forced?”
“The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district”
That’s all the law specified. It didn’t state any the about “boys rooms” or “girls rooms”. If a school determined that a “boys room” will not be regularly used by menstruating students, they didn’t seem to need to stock them.
The law was neutral and didn’t seem to even be thinking of trans one way or another.
So they’re crying about unisex bathrooms again then? How pathetic.
Basically yeah. He’s not a dictator nor did he even do any strongarming as governor.
The bill passed through the state house of representatives with some Republican support even.