CEO Carl Pei says remote work “is not compatible” with the company.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    What work? They are just regular phones, with a bit more ego centric bs marketing showered over.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah their hardware was overpriced and I couldn’t find any justification for their prices being higher than “well but we’re independent and our hardware is aesthetically pleasing”

      Like… I get why Teracube and Fairphone are expensive for their specs. But Nothing gave me cryptobro vibes

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Fairphone are expensive for their specs

        ye, and its a price I gladly paid for my fairphone 5. I love that thing :D

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The thing is… Fair phone is how expensive all phones their capability should be. Its just that most phones are greed machines produced via the exploitation of labor

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The design and interface mostly. Nothing UI is actually pleasurable to use, but I’m a fan of minimalism.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fair, but isn’t it just pretty much just stock android? I guess it’s nice to have another option out there for (almost) stock though.

        • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Stock android doesn’t really exist. It barely works and is missing essential features like working Bluetooth audio. It’s intended as a starting point for companies to build their own experience on top of, if any company released a phone running anywhere near stock android they would be laughed out of existence. Linus Tech tips did a pretty good overview of what stock android is a few days ago https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-hlRB2izres

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Sure, but that’s not really what people mean when they talk about “stock android”. Generally it means a version you would find on a Pixel or Xperia phone, the bare minimum basically without complete overhauls like OneUI etc.

            But you already knew that.

            • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That version doesn’t exist is what I’m saying. The manufacturers have to put in significant work to get it to that point. And along the way they have to choose to make it similar to pixel/what people expect “stock” android to look like, instead of putting their own flair on it. My point is that it takes just as much work to make an android skin that feels “stock” as to make one that doesn’t. You can’t dismiss their version of Android as being “stock” because that doesn’t exist.