• Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    I mean, Libya was still better off with him than with warring factions

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yep, likewise, Saddam was a cunt but he killed three times fewer civilians than our war of terror did.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        That’s not an argument in defense of despots, that’s an argument against profit-motivated colonialism.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yep, likewise, Saddam was a cunt but he killed three times fewer civilians than our war of terror did.

        Wow, all those dead Iranians and Kurds will be thrilled to hear they didn’t exist.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        What about condemning military action in foreign countries for monetary gains?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          At first I was going to write up a long thing about how unjustified the Iraq War was and how we never should’ve invaded, but then I realized you responded to the Libya comment chain. You do realize that Libya was in the midst of a revolution and that the UN authorized a coalition imposing a no-fly zone over the country, right?

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            I remember it as it happened. It was mostly an European affair, pushed by the french who were losing oil access in the country. They decided to side against Gheddafi, despite all the efforts from Berlusconi who was a friend of Gheddafi’s (yeah it’s a bit disgusting) and wanted to protect Eni’s budding interests in Libya.

            The no fly zone helped the (UAE-backed) rebels and hindered Gheddafi, they even put up sanctions.

            NATO didn’t go to Libya with humanitarian intentions, if there weren’t fossil fuels in the country, they’d still be under the Carlos Santana lookalike.