cross-posted from: https://linkage.ds8.zone/post/523771

Before posting an image to the fedi, I want to be mindful about the network burden it will cause. I’m only uploading the image once but potentially thousands of people could end up downloading it.

If it’s a color image, then JPG is typically best. This #ImageMagick command reduces the filesize quite a bit, trading off quality:

  $ convert "$original_image_file" \
    +dither \
    -posterize 8 \
    -sampling-factor 4:2:0 \
    -strip \
    -quality 75 \
    -interlace Plane \
    -gaussian-blur 0.05 \
    -colorspace RGB \
    -strip \
    smaller_file.jpg

If it’s a pic of a person, this processing will likely be a disaster. But for most things where color doesn’t matter too much, it can be quite useful. Play with different -posterize values.

If you can do with fewer pixels, adding a -resize helps.

  $ convert "$original_image_file" -resize 215x smaller_file.jpg

If you can get away with black and white, jpeg is terrible. Use PNG instead. E.g.

  $ convert "$original_image_file" -threshold 30% -type bilevel smaller_file.png

For privacy, strip the metadata

The ImageMagick -strip option supposedly strips out metadata. But it’s apparently not thorough because the following command yields a slightly smaller file size:

  $ exiftool -all= image.jpg

What else?

Did I miss anything? Any opportunities to shrink images further? In principle the DjVu format would be more compact but it’s not mainstream and apparently not accepted by Lemmy.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    4·
    12 days ago

    Sometimes PNG is better, sometimes JPG. So if - for example - you make a screenshot of your desktop that has a photo as a background, a JPG is much smaller but still good quality. If it has only clear UI boxes and a background with only few clearly separated colors, PNG will be better and smaller.

    There also exist tools to compress PNGs even more, like pngquant. Sometimes huge reduction! Come to think of it, similar tools also exist for JPG, e.g. jpegoptim