This is literally the second paragraoh on the wikipedia page you sent:
After the first set of files was published, various technology and media journalists said that the reported evidence demonstrated little more than Twitter’s policy team struggling with difficult decisions, but resolving such matters swiftly. Some conservatives said that the documents demonstrated what they called Twitter’s liberal bias.
Also yeah. Twitter’s owners used to be centrist (center-left), now they are far-right. No “censorship” in this example.
Fact checking is simply trying to guage the trustworthiness of information. Some fact checkers are shit, just like some news sources are shit. Fact checking is not censorship, if you think scrutiny is censorship, then you’ll have a tough time in life.
Your source is a conservative thinktank with no reputation for trustworthiness. Created by this guy who has worked with the republican party. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker
Yes facebook labeled as misleading some vaccine conspiracies. Is that censorship? It wasn’t removed. Secondly entire governments were pushing disinformation and “keyboard army” to try and discredit vaccines. So there had to be some pushback unless you prefer we are all fed putin propaganda.
Your source is a poorly refered online conservative magazine funded by a far-right think tank. Find me a higher quality source.
Hm, did you read the resources expect for Wikipedia snippets? This is censorship in full scale. So back to my point, first as correct liberal stop with censorship.
Echm, no sure, no censorship. You are always right, others are delusional. How I could forgot, that we are between good, smart liberal brains 🧠 - maybe the name of the community confused me…
Also yeah. Twitter’s owners used to be centrist (center-left), now they are far-right. No “censorship” in this example.
Fact checking is simply trying to guage the trustworthiness of information. Some fact checkers are shit, just like some news sources are shit. Fact checking is not censorship, if you think scrutiny is censorship, then you’ll have a tough time in life.
Your source is a conservative thinktank with no reputation for trustworthiness. Created by this guy who has worked with the republican party. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker
Yes facebook labeled as misleading some vaccine conspiracies. Is that censorship? It wasn’t removed. Secondly entire governments were pushing disinformation and “keyboard army” to try and discredit vaccines. So there had to be some pushback unless you prefer we are all fed putin propaganda.
Your source is a poorly refered online conservative magazine funded by a far-right think tank. Find me a higher quality source.
Hm, did you read the resources expect for Wikipedia snippets? This is censorship in full scale. So back to my point, first as correct liberal stop with censorship.
I’m censoring you? Lmao your delusional.
Echm, no sure, no censorship. You are always right, others are delusional. How I could forgot, that we are between good, smart liberal brains 🧠 - maybe the name of the community confused me…