• hobovision@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    From your own source on “true” unemployment, it’s the lowest it has been since they started calculating it. It peaked in 09 at 35% and again in COVID, but all through the early 00s it was between 28% and 30%.

    You can’t use that number as evidence we “already crashed”, because as we’ve seen in other actual crashes it spikes up to 35%.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

      That’s why we see people calculating real unemployment with other variables.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        When the definition of unemployed is changed to exclude the majority of working age people without jobs then it is no longer a helpful statistic.

        U-3 has used the same definition of unemployed since 1940.

        Whatever metric you want to use, you should look at that number and how it changes over time, to get a sense of trend lines. LISEP says the “true” unemployment rate is currently 24.3% in May 2025, which is basically the lowest it’s ever been.

        Since the metric was created in 1994, the first time that it dipped below 25% was briefly in the late 2010’s, right before COVID, and then has been under 25% since September 2021.

        Under this alternative metric of unemployment, the unemployment rate is currently one of the lowest in history.