Amicitas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoNIST proposes barring some of the most nonsensical password rulesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1507arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: cybersecurity@sh.itjust.workscybersecurity@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1503arrow-down1external-linkNIST proposes barring some of the most nonsensical password rulesarstechnica.comAmicitas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square171fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: cybersecurity@sh.itjust.workscybersecurity@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareLvxferre@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI think so, based on the original: “Verifiers and CSPs [credential service providers] SHALL NOT permit the subscriber to store a hint that is accessible to an unauthenticated claimant.” With “shall not” being used for hard prohibitions.
I think so, based on the original: “Verifiers and CSPs [credential service providers] SHALL NOT permit the subscriber to store a hint that is accessible to an unauthenticated claimant.” With “shall not” being used for hard prohibitions.