Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 天前not hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square377linkfedilinkarrow-up1460arrow-down113
arrow-up1447arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 天前message-square377linkfedilink
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 天前Libertarian on its own it just means opposition to authority; both have a similar chance of believing in what you said
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·edit-210 天前Libertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
minus-squareabbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·10 天前This ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 天前True, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.
Libertarian
on its own it just means opposition to authority; both have a similar chance of believing in what you said
Libertarian on its own means nothing. AnCaps are perfectly fine with a “tyranny of corporations” and are therefore not anti-authoritarian. The concept of private property necessitates an authority to enforce property rights.
This ia the correct opinion. Have an upvote.
True, but they’ll agree with the “legal \neq moral” statement regardless because they think it won’t bite at them.