• flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The trailer made it seem like the kind of pretentiously boring mess that the director seemed to think had some profound message that I tend to really dislike.

    Or put more simply, “Looks like the director set $120 million on fire to win Oscars, not make something entertaining.”

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      From what I’m hearing, one of the antagonists is a thinly veiled Rupert Murdoch. Sounds like $120 million to pretentiously explain that Fox News is bad to an audience who figured that out two decades ago.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Thinly veiled Rupert Murdoch?

        Bah, 007 did it 27 years ago.

        I really wanted Megalopolis to be good, but I never had high hopes for it. I’ll probably still watch it eventually because it has a bunch of actors in it that I love + I’m a sucker for future megacities in movies and games (I’m still not over the fact that they cancelled the Star Wars game that was supposed to take place on the lower levels of Coruscant)