Blaze@lemmy.zip to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months agoGoogle is preparing to let you run Linux apps on Android, just like Chrome OSwww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down12cross-posted to: google@lemdro.idtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.bestiver.selinux@lemmy.mlandroid@lemdro.id
arrow-up1126arrow-down1external-linkGoogle is preparing to let you run Linux apps on Android, just like Chrome OSwww.androidauthority.comBlaze@lemmy.zip to Linux@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: google@lemdro.idtechnology@lemmit.onlinehackernews@lemmy.bestiver.selinux@lemmy.mlandroid@lemdro.id
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·2 months agoDesktop Linux has nearly no app security. So the VM approach is a malware prevention. Android is the most used OS in the world.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoMainly for server applications, not for protecing like your .bashrc, your .ssh or .gnupg folder etc.
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoYou cam teach it expected behaviour of apps…but for .folders I would say that falls under SELinux, which seems to have a learning curve to it
Desktop Linux has nearly no app security. So the VM approach is a malware prevention. Android is the most used OS in the world.
AppArmor no?
Mainly for server applications, not for protecing like your .bashrc, your .ssh or .gnupg folder etc.
You cam teach it expected behaviour of apps…but for .folders I would say that falls under SELinux, which seems to have a learning curve to it