• Lupus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oh I don’t know maybe the first three words?

    MONSTERS APPEAL MIGRANT

    Or the next three words that follow

    the MONSTER migrant

    Instead of maybe “the rapist”, no we got to tie in that he is a migrant in all caps, at every possible turn.

    Also further down referred to as

    the MONSTER

    Or

    the migrant

    Oh and also let’s rope in some unrelated burglar who also happens to be a migrant.

    All very easy to spot so I figure you’re not really asking in good faith, just like someone who has an agency in “just asking questions” would do.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So you believe a child rapist isn’t a monster, and that we aren’t allowed to have heated discourse about the legal loopholes being utilized for foreign criminals to escape justice?

      • Lupus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nope, not what we were talking about mate. Op said:

        That’s not outrage being directed at the perpetrator, it’s outrage being directed at an entire demographic of people of which the perpetrator happens to belong.

        You said :

        It’s not in the article, it’s in the comment you were replying to. What am I missing?

        So don’t try to move the goalposts just because you talked shit, I’m sick of this bullshit.

        We were talking about why a, admittedly monstrous, rapist needs to be used to demonize a whole demographic. You pretended like that wasn’t in the article, I proved it was, that is the fucking conversation we’re having here.