• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Probably to avoid linking to kid diddler instances.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Given that half the games are anime waifu sims these days, I can only imagine what horrors you’d unleash letting people link to their profiles on anime waifu mastodon instances.

        Actually no, I don’t have to imagine it since I’ve seen the horrors with my own eyes.

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then why don’t they accept any instance? Fediseer has an api where they can see the most reputable instances and limit to only allowing those reputable instances.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Because of what everyone else here is saying. If you’re a company like Valve, you don’t want to open a portal to undesirable content that isn’t moderated. They chose the biggest instances with the most users because those are generally going to be the safest ones.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        They probably just wanted a handful so they can slap it in a regex and be done with it.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I said cultural clashes, not pedo and MAGA circlejerks.

          Wait, do you not realize what an echo chamber is…?

          Because that’s exactly what I don’t want in my Twitter-like experience.

          I want to watch the opposing groups of internet brained waterheads, who view posting as combat, flail, whine, and throw hissy fits at each other, while on the same platform.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s literally what you’re doing rn lmao you aren’t a spectator you’re in the gladiator pit

            • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              … gladiator pit?

              First off, no, this isn’t combat and I don’t suffer from that delusion…

              Secondly, I’m talking about crazy vs. crazy. I want QANON nuts, antivax moms, liberals that accuse everyone they don’t like of being a Russian bot, etc.

              Finally… I’m having a hard time moving past you calling this a gladiator pit, and implying that I’m a gladiator… Actually, what’s your Twitter handle. You sound like someone I should follow.

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not sure how to respond to this tbh

                Unfortunately I don’t use Twitter so I don’t have a handle

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I love this in principle.

    I just wish Mastodon instances were viewable without JavaScript. Opening the door to many types of browser exploit and fingerprinting shouldn’t be required just for reading.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        idk how you spare the effort.

        When you’ve been building networked systems for longer than JavaScript has existed, it no longer takes effort to spot design choices that put users at risk. When you’ve watched endless vulnerabilities be exploited over the years, it’s not paranoia, but a real-world problem that impacts real people. At that point, the flaws are impossible to responsibly ignore.

        Spreading awareness and showing people how to build safer systems does sometimes get tiring, but I think it’s important.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s simple, when you understand how shaky the foundation of all digital infrastructure is it’s impossible to not be paranoid.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Relevant XKCD.

          The Polyfill incident is bad (that seems to be how the hackers got into the internet archive), and the OpenSSH one could have been really nasty, if it wasn’t caught both early, and by chance (a performance engineer at a major software company noticed).

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I actually gave up recently for my mental health of all things. Turns out accepting being tracked in just about everything I do but also getting all the benefits of living in the future, without the effort spent on mitigation, is a huge relief. Does Google know my daily routine? Yes. Did they when I had the tin foil hat on? Probably also yes.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          I find the negatives detract from the benefits too much, usually. Like having your arm cut off and then receiving lovemaking: I am no longer in the mood.

          • vzq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Have you been watching Bad Monkey? Because that’s literally about half the plot.

        • XNX@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Same it’s much nicer to enjoy the tech/tools. I still ad block on all devices tho

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not paranoid to complain about the unnecessity of javascript when all you want to do is read a public text post on a social media platform. I have javascript disabled on some browsers, and it’s annoying to have to whitelist a site that really shouldn’t need it.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Isn’t it basically a fundamental underlying technology of the web I don’t understand how you can have it disabled and still be able to access modern websites.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            it isn’t. that is html and css, some would argue it’s html only.

            javascript is not needed to load a website. It’s useful for interaction, and needed to load content separately and dynamically. without it you get a mostly (but not totally) static document like in Office Word

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It also does have an API which can be used by apps, including alternate frontends which don’t use JS.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      At the same time people on here are defending the centralization of PC gaming on Steam so even fediverse users don’t understand decentralization

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        How do you imagine decentralized gaming? Every game comes with it’s own launcher?

            • deus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              My friend down the street had an LX back in '83. It was an amazing device but sadly way too ahead of its time.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My fantasy is that PC games become similar to roms, where it’s a single file. Maybe encoded is the system specs, OS, etc.

          Then the “emulator” just works.

          Of course, no financial incentives and a lot of work just to exist. Not to mention, it’ll be impossible to do for modern games. But maybe every game that’s older than 10 years old gets this treatment.

          Also I’m not a OS engineer and maybe this is what Proton is doing with Linux.

          Then pure decentralized gaming on any OS - computer, browser, raspberry pi, “smart Fridge”, whatever has the specs. And the game just works.

        • OhYeah@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The idea is for games to be launcher independent/compatible with many launchers. If I wanna play a game I got on gog I could use the official launcher, heroic, mini galaxy, or I could even use no launcher and just download the game installers directly

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            And how would a launcher identify you’ve actually purchased the game? You still need a central source for that. Hypothetically I guess there could be an activitypub like protocol that all storefronts could use to sync purchases, but that opens up a whole other can of worms, such as account linking, purchase duplications, refunds. The main questions with this hypothetical are

            • Why would stores implement this when they don’t really benefit from it?
            • Why would the users want it when it means creating more accounts and linking them? Why not just stick to one platform that best covers your needs? I guess there would be the “what if Valve turns bad?” argument, but company turning bad is at best a once in a decade situation. If that’s the only reason then the feature won’t be used 99.99% of the time.
            • There’s also a question of who pays for the data? Games are huge and the cost of keeping storing them is factored into the price of the game. However, if you buy from store A and download in store B how is store B supposed to stay afloat when they only eat the cost of storing the game.

            As for going completely launcherless, how do you solve updating the game? Steam was originally made to solve the patching problem, because each patch would effectively shut the entire game community down while everyone waited for everyone else to patch their game.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think people just prefer Steam to Epic or EA’s store fronts. Whenever GoG gets brought up, the only major complaint is is that there’s no official Linux launcher, even when there are Linux binaries for the games.

        • yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          GOG’s Windows launcher is bad so it’s not really a big loss. Heroic Launcher is excellent and supports more than just GOG

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s not very good, but does the job. I mainly used the Mac version before jumping ship entirely. I was surprised that they made a Mac version, but no lINUX version. If you ever wanted to know true pain though, the Mac version of the Epic launch was true trash. Nothing worth playing on that anyway though since they discontinued Unreal Tournament.

            Heroic launch has been pretty good for any of the modern games I’ve tried it it. Eventually, I want to get some of the old Star Wars games running though.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The instance I’m on isn’t federated with every other instance. Why would you expect steam to effectively federate with every instance?

      • Charlie Fish@eventfrontier.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        What? I’m not following. Steam isn’t federating with anyone. This is about having a link to an external site. Nothing more. Has nothing to do with federation directly.