eleitl@lemm.eeM to Collapse@lemm.ee · 2 months agoTrees and land absorbed almost no CO2 last year. Is nature’s carbon sink failing?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down12cross-posted to: environment@aussie.zoneaboringdystopia@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldprogressivepolitics@lemmy.worldfuturology@futurology.todaycollapse@lemm.eeclimate@slrpnk.netcollapse@lemmit.online
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkTrees and land absorbed almost no CO2 last year. Is nature’s carbon sink failing?www.theguardian.comeleitl@lemm.eeM to Collapse@lemm.ee · 2 months agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: environment@aussie.zoneaboringdystopia@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldprogressivepolitics@lemmy.worldfuturology@futurology.todaycollapse@lemm.eeclimate@slrpnk.netcollapse@lemmit.online
minus-squarekbal@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoIt doesn’t require any esoteric scientific knowledge to see the glaring error in that headline, just clear thinking. Trees and land absorbed a lot of CO2 last year. It’s just that they released almost as much elsewhere due to forest fires and so on.
It doesn’t require any esoteric scientific knowledge to see the glaring error in that headline, just clear thinking. Trees and land absorbed a lot of CO2 last year. It’s just that they released almost as much elsewhere due to forest fires and so on.